RCM Pulse Weekly

Revenue Cycle Management Intelligence for Medical Practices
October 16, 2026
Volume 10, Issue 3
Section 01

Medicare Open Enrollment Is Live: 34 Million Projected for Advantage Plans, Average Premium Falls to $12 — and the 2027 Fee Schedule Final Rule Arrives in Four Weeks

Medicare open enrollment opened yesterday — October 15 — and runs through December 7. CMS projects 34 million people will enroll in Medicare Advantage plans for 2027, representing roughly 47.4% of all Medicare beneficiaries. The enrollment-weighted average MA premium is projected to fall from $14.37 in 2026 to $12 in 2027. For practices, three things are landing simultaneously: plan-switching patients whose authorizations need re-verification, new formularies for Part D, and the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule final rule — expected in mid-November, approximately four weeks away.

34M
Projected 2027 Medicare Advantage enrollment — 47.4% of all Medicare beneficiaries
$12
Projected enrollment-weighted average MA premium for 2027 (down from $14.37)
−1.68%
Proposed 2027 PFS conversion factor change for non-qualifying APM participants
Dec 7
Last day to change Medicare plans for 2027 coverage

What the 2027 MA Landscape Means for Your Billing Team

The average premium decrease does not mean plan benefits are richer. The 2027 final MA and Part D rule eliminated eleven Star Ratings quality measures and reinstated a general reward factor in place of the Health Equity Index. For billing teams, the practical impact arrives in these forms:

ActionWhy It Matters Now
Eligibility re-verification for all MA patientsPlan enrollment changes take effect January 1; verifying during open enrollment prevents January claim delays
Formulary download for in-office Part B drugsPremium cuts may be offset by formulary restrictions or PA additions on specific agents
Prior authorization list update per payerEach MA plan may modify its 2027 PA requirements independently of commercial/ACA line changes
G2211 and conversion factor modelingFinal rule (expected ~Nov 15) locks in values you can only estimate now

The proposed CY 2027 conversion factor of $32.8409 for non-qualifying APM participants remains the working assumption for budget modeling. Finalize your 2027 revenue model within 48 hours of the rule’s publication.

Key Insight

Open enrollment is the best time to audit your payer mix for MA growth. If MA is a growing share of your revenue and your AR days are higher for those claims, the premium cut does not help you — a leaner benefit design will offset it. Run your MA vs. commercial AR comparison before December 7.

The MIPS and APM Transition Update

The 2027 proposed rule continues CMS’s push toward APMs and away from traditional MIPS. Traditional MIPS reporting is proposed for sunset in 2029. Practices still on traditional MIPS have two years to assess whether MIPS Value Pathways (MVPs) or an APM path makes more sense for their specialty and payer mix.

Section 02

UHC Prior Authorization Removals Enter Week Three, Cigna Explores Selling EviCore, and the Federal FHIR API Deadline Is Now 77 Days Away

UnitedHealthcare’s removal of prior authorization requirements on approximately 1,700 codes is now in its third week. Practices that submitted claims under previously PA-required codes should be seeing cleaner remittances — but the change is not uniform across UHC’s plan categories. Meanwhile, Cigna is exploring strategic alternatives for EviCore, its utilization management subsidiary, and the clock on the federal electronic PA mandate is running: 77 days until CMS-0057-F’s FHIR API requirements take effect for payers.

77
Days until the federal electronic prior authorization FHIR API deadline (January 1, 2027)
~1,700
Codes removed from UHC PA requirements October 1 (now week 3)
88%
Share of Aetna’s prior authorization volume that is now standardized
−15%
Reduction in overall medical PA volume that Cigna reports since 2025

UHC Week Three: Remit Pattern Watching

The code removals are real, but several nuances are still creating rework at practices:

EviCore: What a Cigna Strategic Review Means for Your Practice

Cigna has disclosed it is exploring strategic alternatives for EviCore — the Evernorth subsidiary that handles utilization management outsourcing for multiple major payers beyond Cigna. A sale, spin-off, or restructuring could affect PA adjudication workflows across those client payers. Watch for any payer notices about changes to their utilization management infrastructure if a transaction is announced.

Warning

With the January 1, 2027 FHIR electronic PA API go-live now 77 days away, practices should confirm with their EHR and PM vendors that their prior authorization workflows will support structured electronic requests. The requirement applies to payers (not providers directly), but practices that can transmit structured FHIR PA requests will process authorizations faster once payers activate the API.

Section 03

AKASA Launches Autonomous Inpatient Coding Spanning CDI and Billing — as the Mid-Revenue Cycle Becomes an AI Operating Layer

The mid-revenue cycle — clinical documentation integrity, coding, and prebill review — has historically required three separate workflows and multiple handoffs. AKASA’s October 2026 launch of what it describes as the first autonomous inpatient coding system spanning CDI signals that AI vendors are collapsing those handoffs into a single continuous layer. Separately, Waystar expanded its AltitudeAI agentic tools to include autonomous claim resolution and conversational performance intelligence, and Suki closed a $90 million Series E positioning its AI scribe as a revenue-cycle operating layer, not just a clinical documentation tool.

63%
Healthcare organizations now using AI for revenue cycle work (2026 survey)
$258B
Administrative costs eliminated by payer automation in 2024 (CAQH Index)
$90M
Suki Series E raise — positions AI scribe as clinical-to-RCM layer
43
Total AI-related CPT codes with 10 new 2027 additions (AMA)

The Three-Layer AI Picture in Medical Practice RCM

Agentic AI and autonomous coding are not the same thing. A useful frame for practice leaders:

Agentic AI
Strategic layer: Appeal drafting, autonomous claim resolution, conversational analytics, multi-step denial workflows. Waystar AltitudeAI; Gemini AI RCM Advisory. Best ROI where denial volume is large enough for automation lift to move write-off rates.
AI / ML
Decision layer: Autonomous coding (AKASA, CodaMetrix), predictive denial scoring, CDI, risk adjustment. CodaMetrix was first Best-in-KLAS winner for autonomous coding (2026). Highest ROI for inpatient-heavy groups.
RPA
Execution layer: Eligibility batch verification, payment posting, statement cycles, claim routing. Most widely deployed layer. Review vendor roadmap before buying standalone tools.
Bottom Line

The convergence of CDI, coding, and prebill review into a single AI layer means treating these as three separate cost centers — staffed separately — has a countdown clock on it. That is a near-term workforce planning issue as much as a technology question. Map your highest-value manual work to the automation layer that addresses it.

Section 04

AMA Releases CPT 2027: 299 New Codes, Maternity Care Bundle Deleted, and 10 New AI Service Codes Bring the Category Total to 43

The AMA released the CPT 2027 code set on September 9, 2026 — effective January 1, 2027. Headline numbers: 299 new codes, 74 revised codes, and 80 deleted codes across the full set (453 total editorial changes). The most operationally significant change: the traditional global maternity bundle is deleted and replaced with phase-specific codes for antepartum, labor, delivery, and postpartum care. FY 2027 ICD-10 (effective October 1) is now in its third week, and the first remittance pattern data from the new diagnosis code set is emerging.

Jan 1
CPT 2027 effective date — 77 days from today
299
New CPT codes in the 2027 set (453 total editorial changes)
35
Total maternity care code changes (17 deleted, 12 new, 6 revised) — most disruptive single update
43
Total AI-related CPT codes after 10 new ones added for 2027

CPT 2027 Priority Changes for Practice Billing Teams

CategoryChangeImpact
Maternity careGlobal bundle deleted; phase-specific codes for antepartum, delivery, postpartumOB/GYN and primary care must update payer contracts and fee schedules
Ventricular assist devices3 new codes including for LVADCardiology and CV surgery update charge masters
AI services10 new codes; 43 total AI CPT codesDocument AI use in clinical workflow for code applicability
Adaptive behavior (ABA)4 new codes (10 → 14 total); 97155 split; new non-face-to-face 97180Mental health and behavioral practices update templates and payer contracts
Sleep medicine6 new codes for unattended sleep studiesNeurology and sleep centers update charge descriptions
Hernia repair9 new codes (open, laparoscopic, thoracoscopic diaphragmatic)Surgical practices update preference cards and charge capture

AAPC reports that, excluding early-release codes, the changes taking effect January 1 include 111 new codes, 63 deleted codes, and 60 revised codes. Practices should prioritize: (1) confirm whether payer contracts reference specific CPT codes for bundling rules — maternity changes in particular require contract renegotiation; (2) update charge masters, encounter forms, and EHR templates before January 1; (3) for the 10 new AI service codes, review whether any AI tools currently in use are billable and whether payer policies recognize them.

Warning

The maternity care code overhaul is the most complex CPT change in years. Practices billing antepartum visits and delivery under the old global bundle face a billing workflow redesign — not just a code update. Begin payer contract review and EHR template changes now. A 77-day window is tight for payers to update their fee schedules and for practices to verify the new rates are loaded correctly.

Section 05

Revenue Velocity KPI Update: Median AR Days Drop to 38.2, Top-Quartile Clean Claim Rate Reaches 97.2%, but Denial Rates Remain Under Pressure

The latest 2026 benchmark data aggregated across vendor datasets shows measurable progress on Days in AR — the median across surveyed practices is 38.2 days, down from 41.7 in 2024. But progress on clean claim rates has been slower: the median is 94.1%, with only the top quartile reaching 97.2%. MGMA’s June 2026 poll confirmed the squeeze: 84% of practices report higher year-to-date operating costs while only 47% report higher revenue.

38.2
Median Days in AR across surveyed practices, 2026 (down from 41.7, 2024)
97.2%
Top-quartile clean claim rate (median: 94.1%)
84%
Practices reporting higher operating costs in 2026 (MGMA June poll)
95-97%
Net collection rate target range (AAFP benchmark: minimum 95%)

2026 KPI Benchmark Table

MetricIndustry MedianTop Quartile TargetWarning Threshold
Days in AR38.2 daysUnder 30 daysOver 50 days
Clean claim rate94.1%97.2%+Under 90%
Net collection rate~93%95–97%+Under 90%
Denial rate (initial)~10–11%Under 5%Over 15%
First-pass resolution rate~80%90%+Under 70%

Prevention-First Denial Management

The practices closing the gap between the median and the top quartile share a common pattern: they automate the highest-volume, lowest-complexity work first. Denial management best practice in 2026 has shifted from reactive appeal queues to prevention-first workflows:

  1. Eligibility verification before every encounter — not just new patients. Real-time tools catch plan changes that would otherwise trigger avoidable denials.
  2. Prior authorization tracking at claim submission — confirming PA status is embedded in the claim release workflow, not checked separately.
  3. Denial triage by recovery value and deadline — sorting by CARC code, payer, and dollar value focuses staff time on high-yield work.
  4. Root-cause analysis in 90-day batches — grouping denials by reason code across a quarter enables pattern recognition that individual-claim reviews miss.
Action Required

If your Days in AR exceeds 40 or your clean claim rate is below 95%, audit your eligibility verification frequency and your claim scrubber rule set before the year-end rush. Q4 volume increases will amplify any existing leakage.

Section 06

Technology Spotlight: Confido Health and Sunbound Both Close Rounds This Week, Suki’s $90M Series E Makes the AI Scribe a Revenue-Cycle Layer, and KPMG Documents a 79% Healthcare M&A Decline

Two RCM-adjacent deals closed in the last 48 hours. Confido Health disclosed a $12.5 million Series A extension on October 14, bringing its total Series A to $22.5 million. Sunbound acquired Richter Healthcare Consultants on October 15 and separately closed a $24 million Series A. These are mid-market moves, but they signal continued investor appetite for RCM infrastructure even as the broader healthcare M&A market contracts. KPMG’s latest report documents a 79% decline in healthcare M&A deal value in 2026 — though buyers still specifically target RCM infrastructure.

$12.5M
Confido Health Series A extension (October 14, 2026)
$24M
Sunbound Series A; also acquired Richter Healthcare Consultants (October 15)
$38M
Healthleap raise for clinical AI screening upstream of CDI
79%
Decline in healthcare M&A deal value in 2026 (KPMG)

The Technology Stack Driving Autonomous Revenue Cycles

Agentic AI
Appeal drafting, autonomous claim resolution, conversational analytics. Waystar AltitudeAI; Gemini AI RCM Advisory (launched October 2026, built on adjudicated claims data). ROI is highest where denial appeal volume is large enough to move write-off rates.
AI / ML
Autonomous coding and CDI-to-billing. AKASA (inpatient, CDI-to-billing), CodaMetrix (professional coding, 2026 KLAS Best-in-KLAS autonomous coding), Waystar/Iodine Software. Highest direct ROI for inpatient-heavy groups.
RPA
Payment posting, eligibility batch verification, statement cycles. Available in most PM/EHR platforms. Lowest-risk, highest-volume automation; review your vendor’s RPA feature roadmap before buying standalone tools.

Vendor Landscape

Autonomous Coding
AKASA CodaMetrix Waystar / Iodine
AI Denial Management
Aspirion Quadax Waystar Experian Health FinThrive
Eligibility / PA Automation
Availity Change Healthcare RxNT Navicure
Analytics / Performance Intelligence
Gemini AI RCM Prism KLAS Research
Key Insight

The KPMG M&A decline does not mean RCM investment has slowed — it means the largest health systems are pausing while mid-market and independent-practice-focused vendors are capturing deal activity. Practices evaluating vendor consolidation should note that several large platform vendors are actively building the AI layer through acquisitions, and per-transaction pricing models are changing accordingly.

Section 07

Compliance Corner: FTC Sends Price Transparency Warning Letters to 24 Healthcare Companies — and Calls CMS Rules a Floor, Not a Safe Harbor

On October 5, 2026 — the same day CMS finalized the Transparency in Coverage rule — FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson sent warning letters to 24 of the nation’s largest healthcare services companies about their obligations under Section 5 of the FTC Act to give patients accurate pricing information. The FTC has also explicitly described CMS price transparency rules as “a regulatory floor, not a safe harbor” and has opened hospital price transparency investigations.

24
Healthcare companies that received FTC price transparency warning letters (October 5, 2026)
Dec 5
Effective date of the TiC final rule (CMS 9882-F) — 50 days away
Jan 1
CMS-0057-F FHIR prior authorization API go-live — 77 days away
2029
Proposed sunset date for traditional MIPS reporting

Three Compliance Deadlines Running Simultaneously

DeadlineRuleWhat ChangesWho It Hits
December 5, 2026CMS-9882-F (TiC Final Rule)Payers post quarterly MRFs; executive attestation required for accuracyPractices relying on payer MRFs for rate benchmarking
January 1, 2027CMS-0057-F (Prior Auth Rule)Payers run 4 FHIR APIs: Patient Access, Provider Access, Payer-to-Payer, Prior AuthorizationPractices need EHR/PM to support structured electronic PA requests
January 1, 2027CY 2027 PFS Final RuleNew conversion factor, G2211 modifier, same-day E/M/procedure ruleEvery practice billing Medicare Part B

FTC Enforcement: What It Means for Practices

The FTC’s position that its enforcement authority under Section 5 operates independently of CMS rules creates a dual compliance reality: meeting the CMS hospital price transparency requirements is not necessarily sufficient to satisfy FTC accuracy standards. The more immediate operational question: are the rates you display to patients in good-faith estimates consistent with what your billing system actually charges? Discrepancies between patient-facing pricing and actual billing are the target of both the FTC enforcement action and the TiC attestation requirement.

Action Required

Before December 5, confirm that your good-faith estimate process (required under the No Surprises Act) uses your actual contracted rates for each payer, not averages or estimates. The FTC’s framing of CMS rules as a floor means the combined compliance risk from price transparency — CMS civil monetary penalties plus potential FTC action — is higher than at any point since the rules went into effect.

Section 08

Independent Practice Watch: 84% of Groups Report Higher Operating Costs — and Only 24% Have Visibility Into Where Revenue Leaks

Independent practices are heading into Q4 2026 squeezed from both sides: costs that will not stop rising, and a revenue environment that is at best flat. MGMA’s June 2026 poll of 251 responding groups found 84% reported higher year-to-date operating costs while only 47% reported higher revenue — and 36% reported lower revenue. Veradigm’s March survey found that only 24% of practices said they had clear visibility into where their revenue leaks, and 48% said denial rates are rising.

84%
Independent practices reporting higher operating costs YTD (MGMA, June 2026)
48%
Independent practices reporting rising denial rates (Veradigm, 2026)
24%
Practices with clear visibility into revenue leakage sources (Veradigm)
~33%
Inflation-adjusted decline in Medicare physician payments since 2001 (AMA)

Where You Should Be: Independent Practice Benchmarks

MetricTypical Independent PracticeTargetPriority Fix
Days in AR40–55 daysUnder 35 daysEligibility automation, claim scrubber
Clean claim rate88–93%95%+Coding education, charge capture audit
Revenue leakage visibilityLow (24% have it)Real-time dashboardKPI reporting infrastructure
Denial rate12–15%Under 5%Front-end eligibility, coding accuracy
Operating cost ratioRising for 84%Stable or fallingWorkflow automation

The practices closing the gap have automated their eligibility and PA front-end workflows and track denial root causes by CARC code and payer rather than treating denials as a single blended metric. The practices struggling are still managing denials reactively — chasing individual claims rather than fixing the upstream workflow.

The Q4 Warning for Independent Groups

With open enrollment now live, the combination of plan-switching patients, pending CPT 2027 implementation work, and the November fee schedule final rule means Q4 is the wrong time to delay technology investments. The practices that historically struggle most in Q1 are those that did not use Q4 to update their payer contracts, charge masters, and EHR templates.

Key Insight

If you are one of the 76% of independent practices without clear revenue leakage visibility, the best first step is not a new technology purchase — it is pulling 90 days of your top denial reason codes from your PM system by payer. That data is almost certainly already there and tells you more than any dashboard you could buy.

Section 09

Specialty RCM Spotlight: Cardiology Faces $700M Cumulative Medicare Cuts, Oncology Sees a Facility vs. Community Split, and ABA Gets 4 New CPT Codes for 2027

SpecialtyKey UpdateStatSource
Primary Care Open enrollment live; patients may switch MA plans, reducing continuity. Eligibility re-verification essential for all MA patients this week. MA average premium drops to $12 for 2027 80% of independent PCPs worried about finances; 47.4% of Medicare projected in MA Medical Economics; CMS
Cardiology $700M cumulative Medicare cut over 5 years; ablations, PCI, pacemakers among highest-impacted (~10% cut on high-volume codes). 3 new CPT 2027 codes for ventricular assist devices including LVAD AR days benchmark: 39.4; denial rate: 12.7% (2026) Cosentus; Revenue Synergy
Orthopedics −6.9% facility-setting reimbursement change in 2026 PFS for general orthopedic surgery. CPT 2027 adds 9 new hernia repair codes AR days benchmark: 34.1; denial rate: 10.3% — lowest of major specialties ReveleRCM; Revenue Synergy
Oncology ASCO: facility-based physicians face ~11% payment decrease; community-based see ~6% increase under 2026 PFS. GLOBE model starts January 1 for affected geographic areas Oncology AR days benchmark: 45.2 — highest of major specialties ASCO; Revenue Synergy
Behavioral Health / ABA CPT 2027 expands ABA from 10 to 14 codes; 97155 splits; new non-face-to-face code 97180 added. Payer contract review required before January 1 4 new codes effective January 1, 2027 — verify payer fee schedule updates AAPC; AMA
Radiology AMA CPT 2027 includes key radiology updates. Radiation oncology remains fee-for-service for 2027; proposed episode-based payment model has not launched Episode-based model delayed — current FFS rules continue through 2027 Radiology Business; synergyhcls.com
Neurology CPT 2027 adds 6 new codes for unattended sleep studies reflecting advances in sleep-testing technology; update charge descriptions and payer authorizations for sleep centers 6 new sleep medicine codes effective January 1, 2027 AMA CPT 2027
Section 10

This Week’s Action Items

$258 Billion
Administrative costs eliminated across all U.S. payers by automation in 2024 — per the CAQH Index. The practices that close the remaining manual-work gap in the next 12 months will not just lower costs; they will accelerate cash flow in a year when Medicare conversion factor cuts, CPT 2027 implementation burden, and payer policy complexity are all moving in the wrong direction. The question is not whether to automate — it is where to start.